Inflation hits hardest on Kiwi families as grocery giants post record profits
New Zealand’s major supermarket chains are celebrating record quarterly profits while ordinary Kiwi families buckle under relentless inflation pressure. The timing couldn’t be more galling for households already stretched to breaking point by cost of living increases.
Woolworths New Zealand has just announced a staggering 12.8% jump in quarterly profits, raking in $298 million while customers faced another round of eye-watering price hikes at checkout. Foodstuffs isn’t far behind, with their latest financial reports showing profit margins that would make a loan shark blush. Meanwhile, the average New Zealand household is now spending 18% of their income just on groceries — a figure that would have been unthinkable five years ago.
Grocery inflation impact
The disconnect between corporate celebration and consumer suffering has never been starker. While supermarket executives toast their “operational excellence” and “market resilience,” real families are making impossible choices between heating their homes and filling their fridges. The cruel irony is that these same companies are profiting directly from the inflation crisis that’s destroying household budgets across the country.

According to Retail NZ, the finding showed grocery spending has increased by 23% over the past two years, but this isn’t because Kiwis are buying more food — they’re paying more for less. Portion sizes have shrunk, quality has declined, and prices have soared to levels that are forcing many families into genuine hardship.
The supermarket duopoly’s stranglehold on New Zealand’s food supply chain has created the perfect storm for price manipulation. With limited competition and barriers to entry that would challenge a multinational corporation, Woolworths and Foodstuffs can essentially charge whatever they want. The Commerce Commission’s market study exposed these anti-competitive practices, but meaningful change remains frustratingly elusive.
What’s particularly galling is how these companies frame their profit announcements. They talk about “challenging economic conditions” and “supporting communities” while simultaneously extracting maximum profit from desperate consumers. The cognitive dissonance is breathtaking. If conditions are so challenging, why are shareholders celebrating record returns?
The human cost of this corporate greed is playing out in food banks across New Zealand. Demand has increased by 40% in the past year, with working families now making up a significant portion of those seeking help. These aren’t unemployed beneficiaries — these are people with jobs who simply cannot afford to feed their families after paying rent and utilities.
The government’s response has been predictably weak. Minister of Commerce David Clark continues to promise “monitoring” and “engagement” while families skip meals. The proposed changes to the Fair Trading Act might eventually create some accountability, but people need relief now, not in three years after a lengthy legislative process.
International comparisons make New Zealand’s situation even more embarrassing. Australian families pay significantly less for identical products from the same companies. The only difference is the level of competition and regulatory oversight. When Coles and Woolworths face genuine competition across the Tasman, prices stay reasonable. When they operate in New Zealand’s protected market, they gouge consumers without shame.
The supermarket chains will inevitably claim their profits are justified by efficiency improvements and investment in infrastructure. This is corporate spin at its most cynical. The reality is they’re exploiting a captive market during a cost of living crisis. Their “efficiency” comes from squeezing suppliers, reducing staff numbers, and passing every possible cost onto consumers.
Small suppliers are being crushed by these giants’ pricing demands, creating a vicious cycle that ultimately hurts consumers. Local producers cannot negotiate fair terms with duopoly buyers, forcing them to either accept unsustainable margins or exit the market entirely. This reduces competition and choice, allowing supermarkets to charge even higher prices.
The timing of these profit announcements is particularly tone-deaf. As winter approaches and heating bills soar, families are already cutting back on food expenses. Energy companies have also announced price increases that will force even more difficult choices. The supermarket giants’ celebration of record profits during this period of genuine hardship reveals their complete disconnection from customer reality.
Real change requires more than strongly worded letters from politicians. New Zealand needs structural reform of the grocery sector, including genuine competition policy enforcement and potentially breaking up the duopoly. Until then, these companies will continue treating New Zealand consumers as cash machines while families struggle to put food on the table.